Quote:
Originally posted by MrPopup
Dignity, but a lack of common sense.
The courts do not look kindly upon arrogance - which is exactly what this dude is doing....acting arrogant...and he's getting some really bad advice by continuing to come in here and talk shit.
I find it laughable that people defend others on the basis of whether or not they've had a drink with them. This entire matter is sad and has brought shame unto the webmaster community.
Those who suggest the "community standards are outdated" model can't even stay focused on why they suggest that model as they bounce between "art is pushing boundaries" and "this is okay because the technology is here and the laws can't keep up with us".
I'd like to find one person who is reasonably familiar with Sweet content AND the laws of the province of British Columbia, Canada who would be willing to say that Sweet content was legal.
There are STRICT provisions here against exactly what was being produced. They've pissed off a stream of the WRONG people in Vancouver by operating outside the bounds of the law.
Because someone drives traffic to your site does not mean they are a good or legal company. Why is this so difficult to see? I guess the bling bling lifestyle is so important to some of you out there that you cant see the true underlying problem with this whole matter.
Did SEG ever once think about the individuals and other companies they were jeopardizing because of their incessant need to break the law? This is a company that put its business partners - other webmasters - at great risk.
And what's laughable now....
*********
Taken from SEG's http://westcoastwebmasters.com/
Concept:
?Promote professional and ethical standards in the Adult Entertainment Industry
**********
If I could write a letter to SEG:
Dear Representatives of Sweet Entertainment Group...
Instead of baiting others to physically fight you, could you clarify please the exact Professional and Ethical Standards SEG was adhering to when they chose to subject every Sweet business partner to a great deal of unnecessary scrutiny? And just so you know...that's a rhetorical question...meaning we all know the answer to it already.
|
\
You Make alot of good points, its nice to see someone who actually takes time to generate a worthy post and makes sense of it!.. I wouldnt expect many responses from the "sweets" on it.