Quote:
Originally Posted by psili
I'm confused by your statement above. Yea, I'm grabbing from the tree-hugging Wikipedia, but I'm still confused by your statement above.
|
134a had legislation to also do away with it and have it replaced by another chemical. Which of course would leave all the current cars with r134a unable to do a charge on their own without having a license for it. Which in turn increases the cost of 134a just as they did for r12. Why are they doing that? I think the motives are pretty obvious.