Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
134a had legislation to also do away with it and have it replaced by another chemical. Which of course would leave all the current cars with r134a unable to do a charge on their own without having a license for it. Which in turn increases the cost of 134a just as they did for r12. Why are they doing that? I think the motives are pretty obvious.
|
1. Well, obviously money. I'll say that's hands down to anything else. I'll ever concede this whole debate is over money and not lives.
2. 134a replacement - what was the chemical and was how was it cost comparative to 134a as a "friendly" refrigerant?
3. Yes, from the wikipedia article, it seems R12 is back in the market, albeit at a higher price from your findings. Is that a good thing?