Quote:
Originally Posted by Webby
Sheesh.... just had a look at the video - utter junk and listing items that just did not happen in that courtroom - and accompanied by "assurances" (no evidence) he was miles away. If that is the case - it should be easy to establish the fact and not have idiot witnesses trying to help by lying and the defendant trying to bribe people to either shut up or tell another version.
It'd hate to rely on that vid for a defense  - but, he could still be innocent and can have his evidence etc reviewed in the appeal process. |
I would have to agree...I felt that video kind of lumped things together and thus came off as being heavily bias. I wouldn't go as far as to say that it said things went on in the court room that didn't....
The facts as I saw presented tonight and as I've read about from both the defense and 3rd parties seem very concrete as a whole. On the other side; there is not even one shred of evidence actually linking him.
I would go as far as to say that unless this is just 100% American media spin; you would have to be an absolute fool to think this guy had anything to do with killing this girl FIRST HAND. If you want to start up a conspiracy theory that he hired someone...by all means go for it; charge him for THAT CRIME; and actually prove something.
Legal systems like this and extreme corruption are prime examples why the 3rd world will always be the 3rd world
