Quote:
Originally Posted by 12clicksMichele
I have said over and over that I am not denying that there have been pitbull attacks. I have also stated that I am sure that not all of those attacks stemmed from irresponsible ownership. What I am saying is that there have been many cases where pitbulls have been misidentified by the media as the breed that actually attacked. And yes I do trust where I have quoted from, being they are a national organization that is affiliated with the ASPCA. I have not researched every dog breed. I have researched the dog breeds that I have either owned or have been interested in owning. I have no interest in owning an Irish Wolfhound so I am not going to pretend to know about them.
|
ok, you astart to sound more rational.
I didn't really get your point with the pittbulls in movies.
Better just keep shoting straight like this woman!
There are probably a lot of attacks that are misidentified.
But consider the most brutal and fatal cases, it can't be hard to identify
what dog did damge.
Hopefully cops just search up owners in a specific area and then start searching that area off and talk with people and look for witnesses.
I don't doubt that there are thousands of dogs misidentified but when there are a lot of damage done by a dog attack I believe it's necessary to get the dog identefied, to provide later safety for both dogs and people around that area, and get a dog identified, and put to sleep.
I don't know for sure of course, I'm just speculating, maybe there some statistics somewhere on this too. There dogs have done fatal damage and never been found.
I am concerned about pitts doing more damage than other breeds when they attack and don't stop with one bite.