View Single Post
Old 05-20-2009, 01:30 AM  
mikesinner
Confirmed User
 
mikesinner's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhutocracy View Post
It's cool but I think we need to stop calling these things missing links now that we have the resolution of human progression we have. It allows for the promotion of the idea that until we find the "missing" ones evolution isn't completely validified which isn't the case because all these links are doing is providing higher and higher resolutions of the fossil record.. Essentially each time a link is found you create two more "missing links" between the fossils on either side. It's like jumping towards a wall by covering exactly half the distance each time and never reaching the wall.. (except of course that the links are finite, but for practical purposes)
Yes, but that's where we stand in paleontology. Until they find hundreds of more skeletons it will be put forward this way.
__________________

My Best Sponsors MPl l Camsl CUMSHOTSl LESBIANSl FETISHl BJ RACESl TEEN BJl BSDMl VODl USE YOUR PC TO CURE CANCER
mikesinner is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote