Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
All they do? They are a earch engine. According to lawyers they control and oversee what is put on there search engine.
|
Yes, they do but they aren't required by any law to black list a site because
the site might be under copyright infringement. The point being, Google is not infringing on any copyright, the website they list is. It's not illegal for Google to list them
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
They have the right to blacklist sites and ban sites for any reason but not do the same for piracy issues or other unlawful acts?
|
Same point as above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
They are also based in the U.S and therefore under U.S law.
|
They aren't breaking any law. Plus, you're talking about copyright infringement not breaking a law.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
That's like saying I started youtube and i am not held liable to what is uploaded.
|
No it's not. Youtube isn't linking to another site with the video. They are hosting the video, and that video is apart of their site. This is not the case with Google.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
You would sue google not for money but for not properly watching what they allow to be put up.
|
They're not putting content up though. They're only linking to the website. There is no breach of copyright. Even if the site they link to might be under copyright infringement, google is not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
This case would be bring up a lawsuit to scare them into policing there search engines because they are liable for copyright infringement tubes/sites that is making money etc.
|
I see no case. If you can name what you would sue Google over, or how you could possible try to sue them for copyright infringement. I mean, where is the copyright infringement? Point it out and you might have a case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
This also goes for incest/beastality.
|
No, because that is illegal. It's very different.