View Single Post
Old 10-30-2009, 02:36 PM  
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
you said it was illegal because it COULD be used to infringe
i said no such thing


Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
While my point proves your to be false
not even close a vcr is not a torrent.



Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
i never said there was a law that EXPLICTLY made it legal.
actually you did,, now you are denying it because you were proven wrong and there is no such law as you claimed with the words "timeshifting","tvshow" or any of the other words you bullshitted about.



Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post

No law says producing porn is ok, it was considered prostitution until someone got a court case that said otherwise.
laws dont say whats ok they say whats not , not ok , no law says producing porn is illegal but there are laws saying distributing copyright material is illegal.. thats the major difference


Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
You want to exclude all court cases, to argue that fair use doesn't apply fine
fair use is decided on a case by case basis.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
then you have to ignore the court case that makes your business legal.
no i dont actually ,as i pointed out there is no law saying it is illegal , there are plenty of laws to say sharing copyright material is illegal.





Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post

the case i am referencing is one where the judge ruled no matter what the tv station does, the timeshifting in a cloud is legal.
maybe he said that about that particular case , but as i pointed out , even an identical fair use at a different time may be infringing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
so if the company keeps selling the RPVR and get caught again they are still not guilty (ruled that was not a crime)
the only people that disagree with you is the rest of the earth apparently as its quite clear it says thats NOT the case





Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post

filing a DMCA notice does not automagically comply with each countries laws.
and if i had said that then you may be correct , big problem is nobody ever uttered those words but you



Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
(according to the written law, all porn actors are guilty of prostitution and all producers are living of the avails of prostitution) you should understand that fact better than anyone.
see the big problem is laws you invent in your head dont count..

There is no such law with any such wording..




Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post

want to quote your source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use ever heard of it but i forgot you are smarter than everyone else and that doesnt apply to you..


Just to repeat incase anyone actually starts to believe gideons bullshit about some old case about vcr's means everything is just fair use.

------------------------

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

Common misunderstandings of fair use.


Fair use interpretations, once made, are static forever(MYTH).
Fair use is decided on a case by case basis, on the entirety of circumstances. The same act done by different means or for a different purpose can gain or lose fair use status. Even repeating an identical act at a different point in time can make a difference due to changing social, technological, or other surrounding circumstances.
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote