View Single Post
Old 05-18-2010, 10:00 PM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by signupdamnit View Post
As much as this isn't uncommon these days I think things like this make it all the more likely for the government and the banks to come down on the industry. I don't think anyone here wants that.

I've always wondered why more people don't make their trials different than the standard model. Here's an example. Give the trial member full access to the members area but tell them they can download or access no more than 5-20 (pick a number) videos of their choice and make this very clear on the join page. Once they go over the limit present the upsell to the full membership. They would have access to any video in theory (so no issues with movies being on the tour but not in the trial member area) but they are limited on how many they can access with their trial membership. Main disadvantage which I see would be some added complexity in the required scripting and databases (you need to keep track of access to the videos for trial members only). This approach might even increase revenues over the current model if done correctly. It certainly seems less shady as well.
or simpler yet make the trial streaming only
put the words streaming only right beside the trial

and make them upgrade to download the stuff
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote