Quote:
Originally Posted by wig
Well, I think that is a little simplistic.
I'm obviously no fan of the situation we find ourselves in, but I'm not sure the people who are calling for the Gov't to get out of the way and refrain from spending money during an economic crisis really understand what the consequences would look like.
What do you think would have happened if Bush/Obama did not attempt to stabilize the system?
I can't even imagine anyone in power choosing to let it all collapse. It may happen anyway, but as a strategy? To do it on purpose?
There is such a thing as the lesser of two evils.
|
The money they spent on the stimulus didn't work, it stabilized the financial district,not the country, they are back do what they were doing before the bail out. The Car companies are continuing to build cars in other countries because it's more profitable for them to do so.
Instead of fixing the problems we have right now, Obama has chosen to pile on more entitlements, that's fucking stupid.
NAFTA is allowing companies to move out of the country for cheaper labor, even Hillary during her campaign said that, but has anything been done, NO.
Simple works, KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid
The only sector that has grown under Obama for Job growth is the government, who pays for that? I know they want the rich to pay for that, UM, aren't they the ones that employ the rest ?
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that