Quote:
Originally Posted by wig
I don't think you are understanding what I am saying. It goes back to the Great Depression.
Arguably, the problem is not with the economic theory itself, but that one part of it is difficult to adhere to -- this being that politicians should reduce spending in good times.
|
No, I understand what you're trying to get across
Politicians are all about getting more to keep their jobs, not being responsible for what will happen down the road.
The government should be ran on a percentage of what the economy is. In bad times, they have to cut back, just like everyone else.
Bush had his presidency in good times and spent a lot of money on some projects, but then the economy went bad and Obama spent like it was good times and it has failed. The jobless rate is shitty and he wants us to smile, FUCK HIM. He's bad for business, you can't raise the cost of business and hope for better employment from that business.
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that