View Single Post
Old 06-20-2010, 07:48 AM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
If I am reading the article correctly this bill would mostly do three things: it would extend unemployment benefits to those without a job. It would extend some tax cuts and the tax credit for first time home buyers and it would remove the 75 million dollar cap on what oil companies must pay to families and small businesses affected by an oil spill.

These all seem pretty reasonable to me.

I suppose you could just let the tax cuts expire, let those who on unemployment figure it out for themselves and keep the cap in place to limit how much BP has to pay out to all those that they have fucked over, but that sounds like a pretty bleak option.

He is blaming the republicans for blocking the bill. They are blocking it because they say it adds too much to the deficit.
why are those three things bundled together

removing the cap against bp sounds like a good idea
the other two are what would balloon the deficit

why not seperate the two issues.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote