Quote:
Originally Posted by garce
I prefer looking at porn that has zero pornstar-ness about it. I would much rather imagine I'm looking at my neighbours than at someone who was paid to fuck on camera.
Although I'm not a voyeur, I do like watching videos that make me feel ike I'm watching the couple next door.
|
This is pretty much along the lines of where I would like to see content going, from my personal point of view. From a business standpoint, I do see what you're saying. I think it can certanly be done- creating and ammassing legal self shot lo-fi content, but I also see where it can be sticky. What's the reward for someone who goes through the pain of crafting and building an awesome amateur library when someone else can come along and scrape it and slap the words "user submitted content" on the page and make the same money for a fraction of the overhead.
Content theft is something the whole adult industry is suffering though on all niches and production levels. I think possibly an advantage to this over studio produced is typically the theives seem to be putting most of it behind members areas, so at least you could see it as competing paid against paid instead of paid against free as many of the bigger names in adult seem to be struggling against.
Again, these are opinions from the peanut gallery, just my thoughts.
