Quote:
Originally Posted by Caligari
|
It's hilarious that you tried to insult my education when you show such an obvious lack of it. Allow me to do what you didn't have the initiative to do yourself, and educate you.
1) A ".com" is not a reliable source of information - ever. You would get laughed out of any credible institution for stating a thesis with a .com as a reference.
2) Your argument contains a logical fallacy. Therefore, the entire argument fails.
You have stated that you are more apt to believe that there is equipment on the underside of the plane because "Air Force Personnel" have confirmed it. The reason this is a fallacy is because, even under the assumption that they are what they say they are, a much larger number of Air Force personnel have come forward and discredited such notions. In order for this premise to be true, ALL Air Force personnel would have to be in agreement. This is known as a fallacy of accident, or a sweeping generalization.
Furthermore, you have amended your original statement to include "military personnel".
Guess what Chachi?
I happen to be military personnel, and I disagree.
*** For the record, I didn't even make it all the way through video one. As soon as he started saying that there must have been witnesses planted on the ground, I realized he was a fucking moron. I know several people who witnessed the second plane hitting first hand.