Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
So it really makes sense to you that the massive amounts of explosives needed were somehow hidden in the building, attached perfectly to the supporting structure and worked flawlessly even after the building was hit by an airplane? All of this, a job that would take literally months and months to do in the open assuming you were not hiding the explosives, was done without anybody noticing and by a team of people that have kept absolutely silent on the matter. That really makes sense to you?
It's no wonder that nobody wants to argue with you about it.
|
I have no idea how long it would take something like that to setup... it just looks like a demolition to me... then I watch videos where apparent 'experts', bystanders, and interviewers alike, all support the notion that the buildings were demolished.
Then they report that security was removed/etc/etc. That's besides the architects saying the building was made to be able to withstand a plane collision / etc. Not to mention shit attached to the bottom of the plane and the unexplainable damage to the pentagon and lack of debris/damage at the Pennsylvania crash site... just saying... if all of that is a load of fucking crap then just link me the vid or report that discredits it... To me - that much is common sense. If I'm that much of a fucking idiot then just take 5 minutes to show me why it isn't common sense.
