View Single Post
Old 08-28-2010, 12:21 AM  
pornlaw
Confirmed User
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,791
Dave -- actually CalOSHA is addressing the subcontractor issue and has determined (while there is no case law or decisions on point to support their decision that I know of) that the purchasing studio has enough control over the content and hence the work site that it should force condom use on the subcontractor and the actors so as to insure compliance. If they do not then they could (will) be liable.

I am still at a loss why the FSC isnt trying to challenge this law instead of trying to work with CalOSHA. From the meetings I have attended, it does not appear that CalOSHA wants to work with us.
__________________
Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote