Quote:
Originally Posted by matuloo
You have a point there, but it doenst mean my argument were nonsense 
Avatar is a fantasy movie situated in a word that was made up, everybody knows that, so it makes it easy to accept a lot of computer work, cause everybody knows its computer generated from the start. The movie is about the fantasy world itself, its not based on actors. Porn is about real things - pussy, dick, fucking
I think there is some misunderstanding in this thread. Its obvious that computer generated movies, be it porn or not are here, and will get more popularity with time. This thread was about real life actors loosing jobs because of that. Thats what I was pretty much reacting to. |
So many movies today have scenes that are almost entirely CG and they are done so well that the general audience can't tell the difference and with that it brings a general acceptance.
Cameron's " Titanic " leaned heavily on CG to create the movie and the audience accepted it. They were willing to overlook the fact the scenes were not real and immerse themselves into the story.
The OP's question was about CG becoming exactly like real life actors and I think at that point the audience will again be able to overlook the fact it's not real and instead focus on the message it's sending.
I once saw an article about Photoshop and they had a picture of a female " model " that was actually a composite of features from many models that had been stitched together using PS. The eyes from one model the nose from another and so on. The end result was a seemingly real model. If I were to post that pic in a would you hit it thread EVERYONE, except those that already new it's origin would think that was a real person.
The day will come when actors will be replaced in the same way and the audience will accept it.