View Single Post
Old 10-05-2010, 11:43 PM  
lagcam
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,892
I think if the fire service had prioritised another call from someone who had actually paid rather than just stand there watching it (if actually true) the guy wouldn't have had a valid complaint, but as it is, I think he can claim to be more than a little hard done by especially as he offered to pay full price.

I am guessing from next year there will be some small print next to the opt out box for that $75 fee where it will say "if we are required to attend a fire on your premises you will be billed the full cost of our service".

Hope he had insurance (and that it wasn't invalidated by this)
lagcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote