Quote:
Originally Posted by stocktrader23
Jim, honestly wasn't trying to be a jackass. Most content producers and even site owners themselves have no idea how to hit this niche. Big affiliate programs are the worst because they are just leeching off the ideas of the smaller sites that started the fad and usually screw it up badly. Something they approve would go in my trash pile immediately.
As for style requests... real homes / rooms (not all the same house), different cameras, some images are blurry, they aren't shot in 'sets' so much, the girls aren't posing for a photog so much as having fun with their boyfriends, etc. The only way I can explain it is to tell you to visit some sites where real people post their real naked pictures and try to imitate that.
I went through 10's of thousands of webcam images when I promoted iFriends heavily. Out of those 10's of thousands I picked around 100 girls that fit the niche and even out of those only about 40% of their images were good enough to use. When done right this is the best converting stuff around. It amazes me that fitting content is so damn impossible to find.
|
There is one reason why it's hard to get good exgf content. It doesn't pay enough to shoot it. The choice for Jim Gunn and others is shoot a scene worth $150 or shoot a scene worth $400+. That's why most talk about shooting a single scene tagged on to someone elses shoot instead of paying enough to fund the shoot.