Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
We don't recognise the models, scenes or locations. Not even content we broker or bought in to resell. The defendant obviously in deep trouble, this isn't a 2257 charge as he clearly doesn't have the documents. It's a child porn charge and he is SCREWED.
|
Actually it IS a 2257 case and NOT a CP case. In order to prove it's CP don't have to prove the "child" in question is actually a child? In America proof of guilt not proof of innocence. The burden is on the GOVERNMENT to prove it's case. Now obviously if the girl looks very young or looks like small child then that makes it easier for the prosecution. But you have a girl that COULD be 16 or she COULD be 19, well I'm not sure how you get 12 people to put a guy away and then be listed a sex pred because he forgot to cross his T's and dot his I's.