Quote:
|
wonder if she is still there now that the money is gone.
|
1. She's married to some other guy (according to her old website)
2. She managed accounts including transfer of funds, so I would love to
see her under oath on the stand.
3. Probably every industry person knows of her role in
Joseph Elking Vs. John Bennet
It doesn't inspire any confidence for me right now.
4. A blast from the past about Chris Mallick. I only post it because it is publicly available informaton.
With regard to his past business dealings and record. He was found to be concealing his background from potential investors (fraud)
It seems the Judge agreed.
"The court concluded that ...the omissions in
Mallick?s background check were the proximate cause of the harm they suffered because
defendants? concealment ?gave plaintiffs an inaccurate perspective from which to value
the Group securities.? 4 Moreover, the court ruled that defendants could have foreseen that
the negative facts omitted in the background report would have demonstrated to plaintiffs
that Mallick was ill-equipped to head the company and that, with him at the helm, the
company likely would suffer a financial downfall".
-SECOND CIRCUIT REVIEW
FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW: LOSS CAUSATION,
'BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP'
PUBLISHED IN
THE NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL
MAY 23, 2001
5. I (me) received an email from Chris Mallick in early December after numerous attempts to reach him using every means possible.
He made a promise to pay ( I have it in writing ).
The deadline came and passed. He didn't pay of course.
He basically went into hiding.
What kind of man is that? Is that a "stand up guy" as some of the bro's were saying at the beginning of this shit?