Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
i've pretty much been focused on this since the beginning, including trying to get to the bottom of what you are talking about- on saturday. i was complaining about the information flow then and peeps had no idea what i was talking about. i think it would of been irresponsible for obama to have mentioned anything about the impending nuclear issues at that time. but that's my opinion, no disrespect to your view.
|
I hear ya, I've been almost "forced" to follow it due to my moonlight gig and I've been watching allot of the NHK news network online but I will admit and say my days are blurring together due to my midnight work sched....
When was that "chart" first released, the 10 day chart showing the diff colors and radiation levels (not the animated one with the globe flattened out) the one that showed 750 (something) hitting the west coast after 10 days of "normal" wind travel from Japan.
a similar chart was released shortly after that showed that 750 number was actually a very small / non lethal radiation amount, I can't for the life of me remember what they compared it to but I do remember I did chuckle a bit.
yes it might as well could have been irresponsible for him to talk about it at that early time BUT with all the various live coverage I just think it was more irresponsible for him not to have said more then he did.
-Loki-