Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
except if that your analogy you just screwed up the arguement
if the base is the movie then remove all copyright protection /closing the base makes no difference since the movie/base already exists.
It not the physically created item that issue but the service that is being run on that
the operation of the base//liciencing of the movie.
that the point, your analogy falls apart because it false
The only one that is valid is base being the act itself, the operation being the rights the act grants
and the people who benefit (from the operation) being equal the3 copyright holders who benefit (from the rights granted).
|
You're going to have run this through your decoder ring and write it in English for me to understand what you are saying here. I feel like I'm reading some kind of broken English.
It is very simple
The government/military is Sony Pictures. The base is the movie they make. The people living around the base are the movie theaters, blockbuster video, Comcast cable and your local store that sells the DVDs. Sony is then the copyright holder since it is their movie and they created it. If they decide to pull that movie off the market (IE shut the base) that is up to them and the stores/people profiting from selling it or showing it have no say in the matter.