Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
ah i see your going bavk to your scumbag i want total control no matter how much it would damage the world arguement again
to bad the law doesn't work like that
the monopoly status of copyright law was only granted based on the agreement to void all rights for the scope of fair use (as defined by the 4 rules of the act).
by your completely bogus analogy, no fair use can exist.
|
You need to up the dose of whatever medication you are on.
All I am pointing out is that the guy in that article says the correct things, he just has the players in the wrong positions.
With his argument about a military base and the people living around it he claims the people living around it/off it should not have a say in military policy. I agree. He says they shouldn't have it because those people are the copyright holders I'm simply pointing out that he is wrong. The people living around the base are not the copyright holders. The government/military is. The people living around the base are simply people making money off of the copyrighted material. IE they would be like theater owners, video stories etc.
In his argument about Blackwater it is the same thing. No, you don't want Blackwater making military policy but not because they are the copyright holders. Again, they aren't. The military/government is and the conflict that Blackwater is hired to fight/work within would be the copyrighted item which makes Blackwater simply hired help.