Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Actually that is not what he said at all. This is your problem. You read something and it goes through your bullshit filter so when you actually comprehend it you have no idea what is being said.
He said, and I quote: "If Nike charged $500 for their shoes, there would still be people that pay that amount. The ones that can't afford don't have the right to own them. There's always Payless shoes."
This means that if Nike charged $500 for their shoes, there would likely still be some people who would buy them. However, those who couldn't afford them would not have the right to own them and they would have to buy a different shoe from a store like Payless Shoes.
He says nothing about Nike being the only one who gets to sell running shoes. He simply said Nike as a brand deciding to charge $500 per pair, there would be other running shoes out there, they just wouldn't be Nike.
|
except he made that statement to backup your bullshit statment that CSI miami represeted true and valid cmpetition to THOR.
which was equal to nikeing being the sole supplier of running shoes and saying that they still have competition because you can run in army boots.
hell it more valid that your bullshit CSI = thor arguement because there are 100k of people in the army every single day doing that. CSI is a totally and completely different demographic.
what he is arguing for is exactly what i am talking about
the content being available on every medium and being sold based on true market driven competitive advantages.