GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - 2257 and Weiner and interesting spin by Greg Piccionelli on Xbiz

Barry-xlovecam · 06-13-2011, 11:03 AM

18 U.S.C. §2257A is on the books ... If it was ever indicted upon it would most likely be found unconstitutional ...

Anyway, Dost is a child porn specific test — in spite of what the D.O.J.'s rationalization is.

Rep. Weiner's images have the intent of lascivious adult behavior. If anything, Weiner is guilty of extremely bad taste (political suicide actually) but there is no law against bad taste.

Furthermore, the US Attorney's Office is not going to try to bring §2257A charges in this case and jeopardize §2257A's standing over this.

I think Greg Piccionelli was making muse, possibly jest, at the ludicrous nature of the law in question ...

Offered in discussion and not as legal advice

06-13-2011, 11:03 AM
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	18 U.S.C. §2257A is on the books ... If it was ever indicted upon it would most likely be found unconstitutional ... Anyway, Dost is a child porn specific test — in spite of what the D.O.J.'s rationalization is. Rep. Weiner's images have the intent of lascivious adult behavior. If anything, Weiner is guilty of extremely bad taste (political suicide actually) but there is no law against bad taste. Furthermore, the US Attorney's Office is not going to try to bring §2257A charges in this case and jeopardize §2257A's standing over this. I think Greg Piccionelli was making muse, possibly jest, at the ludicrous nature of the law in question ... Offered in discussion and not as legal advice Last edited by Barry-xlovecam; 06-13-2011 at 11:06 AM..