The whole conspiracy would hinge on him having sex with a hotel maid; even if the conspirators involved could assure that he'd be provided with the opportunity to have consensual sex with her (in order to establish evidence that could be used to sustain the false rape charge) how could they
count on him taking that opportunity?
I know it is well-established that he is something of a sex hound, and that a number of women have come forward since the rape allegations were made public with stories of him making unwanted advances and all that... but structuring a conspiracy to remove him as the head of the IMF that entirely relies on him having sex with a chambermaid seems unnecessarily complicated and iffy to me. I suspect there are easier, more dependable ways to be rid of an IMF director, through both legal and illicit means. ;-)
To me, this was most likely either (a) an sexual assault as alleged, but alleged by a person with little credibility (it is quite possible to be a liar and an actual victim as well, after all) or (b) rape charges trumped up by an opportunist who realized, either before or after the coital fact, that she was fucking someone rich/famous/powerful. In that scenario, she may have thought "If I can get criminal charges to stick against him, then I can sue him personally, the hotel, the IMF...." etc.
The conspiracy explanation is certainly possible, I just think it is less likely than good ol' greed as a motive behind a false allegation, and less likely than the possibility that this guy is guilty, and just happened to rape someone whose credibility is questionable.
