View Single Post
Old 07-07-2011, 09:20 AM  
TheLegacy
SEO Connoisseur
 
TheLegacy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Posts: 16,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinsain View Post
A security camera on the next door neighbors house actual captures Casey drowning the child in the pool, wrapping duct tape around her head and then placing her in the garbage bags and then placing her in the trunk of the car. This evidence would prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defense successfully has the security tape evidence excluded because of a technicality where the neighbor unlawfully filmed the Anthony's property or whatever ( you get the idea ).

The public gets to see the video tape and knows she is in fact guilty. The jury however doesn't and she is acquitted due to lack of evidence. This scenario give the public a better chance to render TRUE guilt or innocence even though it isn't done though our legal system.
Never heard that - is there a link? I have a problem with evidence such as this not being submitted since it proves without doubt - so have a hard time acknowledging that the judge etc. would simply throw it out as they have used security camera's from many locations to find and catch criminals. American's Most Wanted always shows it and I'm sure the criminals who got caught on tape can't say - "well the store didn't have my permission to film me when I shot the bastard outside in the parking lot".
__________________
SEO Connoisseur


Microsoft Teams: Robert Warren SEO
Telegram: @TheLegacy54
RobertWarrenSEO.com
TheLegacy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote