Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermes
While he does have the right to defend himself and see the evidence, there should be some kind exception in the law that he's not allowed to use the evidence for any other "purposes" than for defending himself, so somehow control his access to the material.
Laws aren't perfect, and they're being modified all the time.
|
How is he supposed to know what evidence they have on him if he is not allowed to see it?