So, IFFOR hasn't published its "best practices" or other policies yet, but .XXX domain holders can go ahead and launch their sites, accept transactions, etc?
Interesting.
I suppose one can't very well break rules that don't exist yet, but I had thought one of .XXX's main selling points was that IFFOR was going to provide oversight and ensure "responsibility" on the part of .XXX site operators.
I guess in the case of casting.xxx, the 'responsibility audit' will have to be applied retroactively. ;-)
__________________
Q. Boyer
|