Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
This is the consequences of greed, nothing else.
You can twist it how you like... end of the day, he's not in trouble for mass suing, this case is not about him mass suing, even if it's what gave him the ability to do it, it's not what he is in trouble for, it's not what is in question, it's not part of the case at all.
|
your original statement was
Quote:
|
Did I read that right.... they didn't get into trouble for actually suing or threating to sue anyone, but rather the misconduct of the action taken.
|
which i responded
Quote:
actually the misconduct was the action of how they sued people and threated to sue people
Using his position to take unfair advantage of others. = sending threatening letters to potentially innocent people
Giving false statements to the court = misrepresenting the validity of the evidence (hiding false positives)
|
it doesn't matter if you sued 100 people or 1 hiding the false positives is giving false statements to the court and that would be the suing people with bogus info.
the same is true for sending threatening letters to potentially innocent people.
it doesn't matter if you do it 1000 or just once it is the threatening to sue people.