Quote:
Originally Posted by raymor
Cda, cda ii, coppa, all if the major anti-porn laws have been about "protecting children", "keeping porn away from kids". Look at all of those (unconstitutional) porn bans during the Clinton years. They all created more problems for freely available porn than for content protected from access by kids (and people without credit cards).
The OP certainly does have a point. It's not like we don't know what a porn ban looks like. Clinton tried it three times and three times got overturned by the supreme court. It's always been based on the theory that you can't have it out there for just anyone to get, that access must be limited to adult members.
|
The same mistake is being made all the time by the easily scared. Ray thanks for the only sensible reply. The children can keep blabbing.
The mistake is to take seriously what a campaigning politician says to a crowd. If she doesn't know it's impossible she shouldn't be standing for the job of President.
If it were possible to take porn off the Internet is would be the biggest boost to the porn industry
ever. Millions who are hooked to porn and get it for free will have to start buying or rely on what they downloaded already. It's not possible so another dream.
Banning free porn.

So Pornhub charge $1 for a lifetime membership. If you can't or won't pay. They're better off without you.
The rest of the blah blah is just that. Blah blah.