Quote:
Originally Posted by inthecrack
We all know that to do well in this saturated market you have to do something that no one else is doing. The nice locations and extra care in post production are two of the things that we like to do to get that edge. We have a niche. Just because it isn't your niche is no reason to bash it.
|
I'm not sure if you mean the 'niche' of good photography, or of the content.
Your photography and attention to detail is fine, laudable in fact. I love the nice, if cliched, locations (there are plenty of beautiful locations in Canada, not just scruffy couches in basements, which would make an interesting change, IMO, to tropical locations) and the quality photography.
So yeah, maybe it is just that I think it's 'wasted' on that kind of content; not sure. I admit I can't comprehend how jaded you have to be to need to see the uterus of a woman to get off, but I'm willing to generalize long enough to say that such people are unlikely to be too fussy about the background, which they can't see anyway staring up a cunt.
Furthermore, I think if that's your target market (fair enough) your site does not suggest it. If I signed up based on 90% of the sample pics, which are 'soft', and found out the emphasis was actually on gaping orifices, huge 'insertions' and/or urination, I would be demanding a refund, and certainly would not be renewing.
In fact I think the fact you don't emphasize what your 'niche' is on your site, preferring instead to show off the locations you shoot in, demonstrates that you yourself believe that the niche is 'ugly'.