I don't want to group all official story believers together, as not all believe exactly the same story, so I know this won't apply to all of you.
There's a major flaw in your arguments. On the one hand you believe that if one floor near the top of a skyscraper is hit it will take the whole skyscraper down in it's own footprint, but when people say to you that this is a controlled demolition, the rules change and you say "They wouldn't have time to rig the whole skyscrapers up", but according to your first belief only one floor needs to be taken out, so doing a controlled demolition of one floor perhaps with some burning jet fuel added for good measure would be enough.
Is it possible that the controlled demolition firms have been ripping us off for all these years, pretending they needed to work long hours rigging up a whole building, using far more explosives there were necessary, when all they really needed to do was blow up one floor near the top?
Assumptions are dangerous, it is only the highest-order of thinking that questions the assumptions that most of us make. This order of thinking is known as critical thinking. Next time you watch the news, don't believe what you're told, question everything, no more assumptions. Research for yourself
