Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
Yes the plane impacts made a difference. But two buildings hit in a different way collapsing in an identical and improbable way are beyond suspicious. A third building also falling symmetrically intoi its own footpront, as they say, is even more suspicious.
|
Dude, they don't. The collapsing, especially the start of it, is different. You can see that on the thousands of available videos. The first tower that collapsed you see that it really breaks and start to reach over. The whole part from impact to top stays intact for a few seconds. The second tower drops down from the inside, top down.
Also, the idea of falling "symmetrically into it's own footprint" is just not true. If that was really the case then there would not have been so much damage on all the buildings around it. Sure, they fall down, as not over. But really look at the videos for one moment and really try to see what's happening. It's not that "perfect" as people may tell you. What bothers me is that the two towers do not come down as if it's a demolished building, but many people will tell you that because they have building 7 in mind as well. Building 7 is a different story, you can argue about that (just pure about the comparison of collapsing buildings). But the collapse of building 7 was again totally different then both towers.
I don't mind if you feel it's suspicious. Good for you because I do not believe everything that was written and said. But using a bit common sense makes a lot more clear.