Very true. Thanks for backing me up for once.
The votes and comments from the consumers is what tells the truth.
No big budget. No big set up, no fancy equipment. Just a guy in charge of the shoot who has a clue and a lot of profit, so we don't have to rush it.
Quote:
|
PM thinks porn should be done a particular way or a few ways.... when the reality is, the mass variety in every aspect, is exactly what makes porn so kick ass. If even a few people like totally amateur, cell phone shot, home-made porn, of ugly fat fucks... then that's exactly what the Internet needs, because someone is buying it.
|
What thread are you reading. I think you posted this in the wrong one.
The consumers of "totally amateur, cell phone shot, home-made porn, of ugly fat fucks" want it real. Not bad shooting, not amateur shooting, not cell phone. They go to that section because the
believe it's being done for real.
Just like the scene I started the thread with, just like the 3some I shot and the votes and comment back up.
It can be Andrew Blake to DVTimes. It can be very soft to Max Hardcore. All they ask is
Keep it real. Actually Max Hardcore is a great example of what I'm saying. If you can stomach that niche it is because you
want to see girls in distress while being badly abused. Does anyone here think Max or the girls are faking it?
The reality is,
the buyers are sick to death of the fake, plastic and unreal product most people put out.
Glad you're still clueless and reading into a thread something that isn't there.