Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt
rather promote CCBILL programs, no minimum payouts which for webmasters who promote a lot of programs/sites matters since you might do a couple of sales on a NATS/MPA site and then not do another sale or two for months to reach minimum payout, which means you wait for months to get paid. also a ton of non-CCBILL programs have just closed their doors and said fuck you to affiliates who are owned money. I'm going to trust CCBILL a lot more than somebody I have no clue about who they are and what their situation is who is running a program on NATS/MPA. Of course if a site is really converting and making you money you take the risk and promote it.
some people think CCBILL ratios are much higher/worse than NATS/MPA - i don't see that but know many people who absolutely believe it.
not many CCBILL programs do pay-per-signup which hurts since many webmasters will only be interested in PPS.
|
Are there certain aspects of CCBill reporting that you would improve upon?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicky
I prefer nats programs.
|
Is there something specific about NATS you prefer? Detailed stats? User Interface? Etc?