View Single Post
Old 12-05-2011, 09:15 AM  
myjah
Back in the harbor
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt View Post
rather promote CCBILL programs, no minimum payouts which for webmasters who promote a lot of programs/sites matters since you might do a couple of sales on a NATS/MPA site and then not do another sale or two for months to reach minimum payout, which means you wait for months to get paid. also a ton of non-CCBILL programs have just closed their doors and said fuck you to affiliates who are owned money. I'm going to trust CCBILL a lot more than somebody I have no clue about who they are and what their situation is who is running a program on NATS/MPA. Of course if a site is really converting and making you money you take the risk and promote it.

some people think CCBILL ratios are much higher/worse than NATS/MPA - i don't see that but know many people who absolutely believe it.

not many CCBILL programs do pay-per-signup which hurts since many webmasters will only be interested in PPS.
Are there certain aspects of CCBill reporting that you would improve upon?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicky View Post
I prefer nats programs.
Is there something specific about NATS you prefer? Detailed stats? User Interface? Etc?
__________________
VP of Marketing
AVN Media Network
Skype: AVNJill
[email protected]
myjah is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote