Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio
you really have to spend some time reading the case and accusations...kim.com must prove bad faith on the part of the NZ police department when they made their paperwork error...in order to do this his lawyers must prove that the NZ police department actually had something to gain...good luck with that one LOL  ... |
Do you even understand the concept of getting off on a technicality. If you had to prove that bad faith to get evidence throw, all the police would have to do to get away with violating your right is to say "oops sorry it was a mistake".
There is an argument that they can simple back date the transaction the correct warrant but there is a bit of the problem, the government is now 100% aware that the seizure destroyed peoples legit backup. They would deliberately destroying legit property with full knowledge that what they were doing if they do that.
That has a liability.
Quote:
let me repeat for you: the hague war crimes tribunal defendants got the same deal...some of them got monthly allowances $20K+ and they were being tried for ethnic cleansing/mass murder/human organ harvesting ect ect....they did NOT win their case in court later on ...
you are also focusing on the wrong country...its the USA who is after his ass...
|
exactly the previous poster said
Quote:
|
its a moronic point to make because this was probably a trade off for the paperwork errors made during his arrest
|
there is no way that he gave up possibility of hamstring the US governments case (limiting them only to the evidence they collected before the arrest) for a income stream he will get anyway (as you pointed out).