View Single Post
Old 04-09-2012, 11:00 PM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
1. There is no Nuclear Option Robbie. Congressional Representatives are not going to be donning "we love porn" campaign buttons. Porn is only tolerated for reason of Federal Court decisions. The more likely scenario is that the lawmakers are happy watching the porn industry cannibalize itself.
It doesn't stop the problem of free porn easily available to children.

Quote:
2. §2257 is a US Law and it stops at US borders. Our company is Dutch we only recognize Dutch Laws and EU Parliamentary directives. U.S.C. 18 §2257 is in contradiction to The European Union Directive on Data Protection that is our law -- we can only provide information by a Dutch Court's order to do otherwise is unlawful in our domicile. That doesn't mean we don't have proper identification documents and model releases -- it means that they are confidential unless subject to release by the Dutch Court's order.
Then maybe a law that says if you want to do business with the US, comply to US laws or don't tap into our markets. Of course this would apply to US people tapping into Dutch markets. If people can tell me there's a girl in the next village waiting to talk to me and advertise inn Czech. Sites can obey the laws of the countries they appear in, or not appear there.

Quote:
Few of the "tube" type sites are located in the USA and if their servers are they only have to look to the recent events in the megaupload.com matter to get the big picture. §2257 will have little affect on tube sites.
See above.

Quote:
3. In the litigation of COPA it was found that there was no reliable way to restrict explicit adult content on the Internet to "adults only." Short of issuing everyone an Internet verifiable national ID card, with even that being ineffective as international commerce would be restricted, there is no way that access to adult pornography in the USA can be restricted constitutionally.
See above.

Quote:
4. Bottom line, the old ways have already been destroyed. Destroying the destroyers with new laws is laughable. The only remedy to the situation is a new disruptive innovation.
Good luck on anyone in porn coming up with anything new.

Quote:
Generally speaking, minors don't purchase porn anyway.
The purchasing isn't the problem, it's the access to it. Is there already a US law for allowing access to porn by children in a porn shop?

Last edited by Paul Markham; 04-09-2012 at 11:04 PM..
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote