Quote:
Originally Posted by ilnjscb
A more succinct way to say the above is: better products sell better
I'm not sure that will ever change, and I can't see how we pin that on the tubes. It pre-dates them by 11,000 years.
|
I was saying that here 10 years ago and that's when the haters started hating. They don't like the truth. The problem is simply budgets. If you can afford it the quality content is there to be had. There are loads of offline shooters who will turn out movies of the quality of Orgasm.xxx. but not for $2,000 a scene. Anyone who wishes to question that need only hit me up on ICQ for a list of shooters.
Quote:
|
However, the other adage is: Location, Location, Location
|
Is a Tube site
the best place to sell quality porn today? If so, the money isn't there. Or ThePornTubeGuy wouldn't be asking people who don't have the raw product to edit, to do it for free.
I have been inside a lot of websites shot by people who are lauded here. These guys are simply not good enough. They shoot hardcore dull porn that all blends into one. The scenes all start to look the same and follow the same format time after time. No comedy, no closure, no reason for the fucking, and the girls mouthing the same sound bites over and over again. No matter how clever a person is with the latest equipment, the vital skill in porn isn't camera's, lighting, etc.
It's the shooter seeing the fantasy in his head and getting the model to perform as he needs. We sell fantasy. If we can produce it.
The biggest sex organ is the brain.
It's not "I would fuck her". It's
"Would she fuck me?"