So if ya'll are disputing the claims made in teh story, which claims specifically are you disputing?
All the criticisms I just resd here had no content and contained no specifics, they sounded political, not fact based.
I don't care one way or the other, I can just tell the difference between fact based claims and political and personality based claims.
Lay out the facts you see as in dispute.
I think it's interesting that the available tests can only check for antibodies, that there is no effective way to test for active infections.
Funny to have syphilis make a comeback.
One item I missed - where did he get infected? What was the source?
|