Quote:
Originally Posted by Nautilus
Anything less than a 3-strikes policy to terminate repeat infringers is not cooperation but conspiring with uploaders to fuck copyright holders. When they merely disable the reported links without taking any further action, often without even deleting the master file, such kind of "cooperation" makes it an uphill battle for you to keep your content off their site. Because uploaders will simply repair the deleted links a short time after and you'll have to start it all over all the while losing money to file lockers and upload monkeys.
Please cc your DMCAs to infringements(at)copycontrol.org anyway, AK needs these reports as a proof of systematic repeat infringements to show to billing companies, hosts etc.
|
Well I have to wait and see, you can't just claim everybody is conspiring without gathering some evidence. I am not going to write a letter to their host when the host has done everything asked of them. I will do so when i have that evidence, which is only a matter of time. There is no need to rush things and report them today when i can report them next week after they've ignore a dmca notice
As of right now, they took down my content immediately and claimed they banned the user, if i notice the user switch to another filelocker (which he doesn't usually need to do), then that would be further evidence to support that they are cooperating. You will have a hard time going after people that respond to dmca notices in a timely manner and delete the user. Pretty sure that is all they are asked to do. So that is why i rather put my time into going after ones that do not take any action, like sharpfile. You can knock down 100 easy targets before taking down one that is following the rules pretty well.
I did cc copycontrol regarding sharpfile