Quote:
Originally Posted by PhadPanda
|
The article states:
"hostility King has faced from some elements of the adult content community itself. Some of the critics, such as those on adult industry forum GFY, have on occasion accused King of setting anti-piracy standards that are too high for any file-locker to achieve"
Those critics in GFY was not made by adult content community. It was made by cyberlocker real and fake profiles only, since this is a board anyone can write into. Does anyone really into "adult content community" been criticising AdultKing here?
"Some, it later became apparent, had interests not only in the adult content market, but the file-hosting business too."
"Some" only?
Ok so if someone from adult content community does a fake nick in a filelockers support thread and write: "adultking is right". Will this mean some pirates agree with adultking?
Interesting way to do "journalism".
Their unbalanced "journalism" it is evident at the end of the article, finally they just ask feedback from pirates, not from any content owner: "Has AdultKing?s campaign affected your business? Have you been affected by payment processors? hardening attitudes towards file-sharing sites? Are you adapting to life without PayPal in the file-sharing space? If so, please contact us via the contact page."
The comments are all pro-piracy of course. The most funny one it is: "The last time that there was an article stating the actions of this guy there was a lot of major trolling in his defence. So wouldn't be surprised that the same happens again here. ".
Ah not, this "Batman Returns" one: "All we have to do is wait. We're in the middle of the tunnel right now, but I believe in Kim Dotcom? Megaupload is going to come back."