View Single Post
Old 11-06-2012, 08:32 AM  
potter
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,559
lol. I've always wondered why people have such a hard time separating someone pointing out a flaw in their statement with arguing the overall subject. If someone makes a case for one side of an argument using three points, and you simply point out that one of those points are wrong. They will immediately get defensive about their stance, and then either defend the overall point or attack you for being on the opposing side (when you never were).

Quote:
Originally Posted by astronaut x View Post
Costs? No.

14 to 8..... has created huge lines.

Besides FL should be able to afford it. They saved all that money on the choo choos, and all that money on drug addicted welfare recipients. Supposedly.

Its called voter suppression.
I never said it was cost. Why do you feel the need to argue the point of cost?

Quote:
Originally Posted by astronaut x View Post
There has never been one complaint from anyone on either side about costs.

I have skin in the argument. I volunteer at polling stations. Its not costs.

Its voter suppression.

Ohio has done the same thing. States that are deemed all ready decided haven't touched voting days.

It's so fucking obvious.
lol.. I never said it wasn't voter suppression.

Quote:
Originally Posted by astronaut x View Post
What dog do you have in this fight? You live in Denver, you know nothing about Florida and whats been going here.

Just shut the fuck up.
So angry, and for no reason. lol.
__________________

potter is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote