Quote:
Originally Posted by purecane73
You're exactly right...that's why there hasn't been an ATF director for seven years. Congress is too busy chasing steroid users and pointing fingers at each other. And hey, if you had that kind of job security why work at all? I means those guys got voted in once back in the eighties right?
|
This is what I'm saying. At a certain point in time, it's just no longer worth the fucking effort.
This is not a Republican VS Democrat thing. The ATF hasn't had a director in seven years. Why didn't Bush put one in place? Why didn't Obama do it in the past four years? Because it's going to take too much effort, time, and resources, and once they get in office it's just gonna be more up hill battles to get things done.
Look at what's happening to Hillary. One hundred and fifty men using trucks armed with heavy mounted machine guns attack an embassy and they are blaming this on Hillary saying it's her fault - Never mind that Congress plays a huge part in funding security for the embassies. WTF?
This is all Congress does at this point - plays games for political capital. Picking the right person for the job is not longer even remotely part of the process.