View Single Post
Old 01-28-2013, 04:06 AM  
nastycreator
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: República Dominicana
Posts: 56
Is REPORO scam for advertisers???

Hi Guys I want to comment something with you.

Do you think that REPORO could be a SCAM for advertisers?

I mean:
Reporo have a very little traffic from webmasters. Almost all traffic is bought from other ad networks. You could check this very easy way:
If you visit the redirect code of juicyads you will find first network ads, and after Reporo redirects.
If you visit the redirect code of Plugrush you will find first network ads, and after Reporo redirects.
If you visit the redirect code of trafficholder you will find first network ads, and after Reporo redirects.
And more more more ad networks.

I'm useing GEOEDGE proxy and I assure you that this happens in a lot of countries.

I have a question for all those networks... Why are you selling your traffic to other ad network???? I don't understand this policy. with this behavior you are subtracting efficiency to our advertising, because we (the advertisers) are buying you and reporo traffic. And finally we are paying twice impressions for the same user.

And one more question to Reporo. Why are you buying traffic to other networks and sell it to other advertisers??? Currently I'm buying traffic to those networks too. I don't understand. I don't need another "media buyer". If I need traffic from Juicyads I want to buy myself and, I don't want you to buy for me.

And the last thing....
In Reporo Terms and conditions you will find this:

No Assignment or Resale of Ad Space.

The parties may not resell, assign or transfer any of its rights hereunder, except to any of their Affiliates provided that such Affiliates are not competitors of the other party. Any other attempt to resell, assign or transfer such rights will entitle the other party to terminate this contract immediately, without liability on the part of the terminating party. "Affiliate" means in respect of a party its "holding company", its "subsidiary company" or a subsidiary company of its holding company, as those terms are defined in section 736 of the Companies Act 1985.

it's funny, right?
They don't permit to do the things they are doing
nastycreator is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote