i dont want to instigate a riot but debate i hope is fine. "better" is a strange term to use when you buy blind network traffic.
does better mean better conversion ratio? if so then your cpc bid is adjusted to meet CPA.
does better mean it converts at a better ratio but at a lower price? if this is the case then it is only better for the advertiser and not the publisher (as if it is cheaper then perhaps the network selling it doesnt have enough buyers to compete with you) whom you were previously worried we might be under paying.
does better mean total amount of potential conversions? if so then this just comes down to how much volume of a particular profile your looking to buy and how much any one network (or site for that matter) has available.
only my opinion but hope its valid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nastycreator
Why is that bad? Let me explain you from an advertiser point of view:
I pay 0.02 from unique visitors from USA mobile traffic. 0.02 to juicyads, 0.02 to plugrush and 0.02 to reporo.
One unique user visit juicyads and see my ad (+0.02). refresh the page and visit my ad in plugrush (+0.02), and refresh the page and see my ad in reporo (+0.02). I have pay 0.06 per unique visitor that see 3 times the same ad.
I'm not talking about brokers. reporo is not a broker, is an ad network. Is different.
Exoclik and traffic shop does not permit this practise and his traffic is better than reporo.
|