02-04-2013, 09:35 AM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,626
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewNick
So you want to replace a competitive free market system with a state run tax funded program ?
|
It's really not that competitive.
Good editorial:
Quote:
SINCE 1974, when the Justice Department sued to break up the Ma Bell phone monopoly, Americans have been told that competition in telecommunications would produce innovation, better service and lower prices.
What we?ve witnessed instead is low-quality service and prices that are higher than a truly competitive market would bring.
After a brief fling with competition, ownership has reconcentrated into a stodgy duopoly of Bell Twins ? AT&T and Verizon. Now, thanks to new government rules, each in effect has become the leader of its own cartel.
The AT&T-DirectTV and Verizon-Bright House-Cox-Comcast-TimeWarner behemoths market what are known as ?quad plays?: the phone companies sell mobile services jointly with the ?triple play? of Internet, telephone and television connections, which are often provided by supposedly competing cable and satellite companies. And because AT&T?s and Verizon?s own land-based services operate mostly in discrete geographic markets, each cartel rules its domain as a near monopoly.
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/28/op...tels.html?_r=0 |
|
|