View Single Post
Old 02-13-2013, 04:15 PM  
signupdamnit
Confirmed User
 
signupdamnit's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgeyw View Post
Robbie, as the old saying goes, there is more than one way to skin a cat.

Same goes for cookie stuffing.

Cookie stuffing is as has been mentioned - adding a cookie for a site that a surfer did not intend to visit ie popups, images, embed, iframes, blah de blah blah - anything that adds a cookie for a 3rd party website = cookie stuffing.
I think I see a bit what Robbie is saying. I don't consider stuffing a cookie to a single site to be negative cookie stuffing as long as it's just one site and the site's material is actually being shown on the page within reason. Now that urls are all over the place on content that is just being a smart affiliate and making sure you get your commission. It's not that much different than linking a ccbill gallery to go through ccbill's site first before the vistor lands on the actual gallery. Now if you open 100 sites in 1x1 i-frame that is something different.
__________________

You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.
signupdamnit is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote