duk75

* What makes a webcam program not worth promoting? -Ugly girls; -sassy rude girls; -Terrible or restricted free chat; -Very expensive sign up fare for the clients; -No model referral program; -Less than 30% revenue share; -No payoneer payment; -A lot of restrictions about countries of the users; -No interface in other languages beside english.

* If cams is so hard to push, what would make it easier?
- Free sign up, with some benefits from signing up, like unlimited free chat. -Free sign up with 10 free coins or credits or something, so they can get a little taste of what it is to be a full member.

* In a perfect world, what would you need from a sponsor to be successful (tools, WL features, etc..)?
Script to make a pop-up; the live models gallery (the one that shows the currently connected models), dynamic and customizable, like choosing only to show blonde girls 18-22; or something like that. Whitelabel is very important, it should be easy to configure, like with CNAME, instead of other complicated methods; and you should be able to change the text of general parts of the site, for SEO reasons, use a customized template, and be able to use google analytics and google webmaster tools.

Also the idea of giving free cam credits for the affiliates is a great stimuli, as promoting webcams implies a lot of effort, and it is very risky.


And, in other words, a perfect webcam site should be better than myfreecams, which is free for most users. Who is going to pay when they can go there and get things for free?
Of course, they work by tips. I think this is a better way to function for a cams site, than the typical fee per minute per private. And, obviously, I think no one that has ever visited myfreecams has joined another site.